04 April 2009: If accurate, and there's no reason at this time to doubt the accuracy at this point, the linked report below is the best I have seen regarding HUMINT on the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden since he fled Tora Bora, Afghanistan in late 2001. Many will be stunned to see that I am linking to the Huffington Post for this report. The source in this case is unimportant - the OSINT information within it is extremely important. For all intents and purposes it has apparently been suppressed for at least the pst five years.
Hurricane Ida information
7 hours ago
6 comments:
Just one more reason that sooner or later, Iran will have to be confronted.
Our current leadership seems to believe that it will be better to confront them AFTER they obtain nuclear weapons. I am guessing that our president believes Iran's basic problem is insecurity. Once they have the bomb, then they will feel secure from our attacking them. They will then change their ways.
I disagree. I have always felt that if confrontation is necessary, it is usually better sooner rather than later. In this case, waiting until Iran has nuclear weapons can be disastrous for the region, the United States, and ultimately, Iran itself.
I liked the story of our President at Camp Vicory and 600 soldiers showed up. Last time I was at VBC (Victory Base Complex), about 10 days ago, there were over 15,000 soldiers there, let alone contractors.
We will not deal with Iran as long as we have a usurper in office. This imposter has thrown open the barn doors and will give away the kitchen sink to his islamic brothers.
Rich
joe six-pack said...
"I have always felt that if confrontation is necessary, it is usually better sooner rather than later."
My point exactly! The longer we wait, the tougher it is going to be to do anything about it, and the more devestation will occur. I refer you to Europe of 1939, and what it looked like in 1945.
And I am afraid that no one in this "administration" understands that talking to Iran's leaders wil accomplish nothing, nada, zip, squat... you get the idea.
Iran will have to be confronted.
However, it's very likely that the United States will not be the force that does the confronting.
As I currently view this, the Usurper-In-Chief will never confront Iran.
In fact he is doing the exact opposite - he is functioning as an enabler of Iranian power expansion and hegemony in the entire Middle East region as a key part of his betrayal of Israel.
I do not believe Iran will be confronted or punished militarily until the War of Gog/Magog occurs - Iwhich I believe will occur in the not too distant future - exactly as described by the prophet Ezekiel in chapters 38 and 39.
As we can see on all the news services of credible ethics, which are very few if you ask me, Iran is going through their own form of Civil War. I feel for the few who are asking and fighting for freedom but I also feel that when it is done it will still be run by sharia law. If the Shaw falls, is it not the same type of ruling with Amadinnerjackets opponent? Won't ISLAM still be running the Government and the same ISLAM who wants to kill AMERICANS? they are claiming right now that we are meddling but in fact the present person who claims to be our President hasn't said anything but that the World is WATCHING. I know we as good christian Americans need to support Human Rights and the pursuit of FREEDOM but isn't this just taking away from the real facts that Iran and North Korea are trying to kill Americans and that no matter who wins the Presidency in Iran, it will still be ISLAM?
Post a Comment