Illegal Obama Campaign Activity at ISNA Convention

07 SEPTEMBER 2007: More "Obamination" Updates. Found the below and the second item below side-by-side with my report at Atlas Shrugs .

"Check out: MUSLIMS FOR OBAMA where the Muslims for Obama website announces that from they are running a voter registration drive at Masjids (the Arabic word for mosques) in the US."

So I did, I checked it out. See that card on the right-hand side of the image above. It reads:

"DONATE $1 DOLLAR for ONE NATION UNDER GOD"

Are these Muslims implying that Obama is the Islamic messiah, the al-Mahdi, or have they made a poor translation and actually meant to write:

"DONATE $1 for ONE NATION UNDER ALLAH"

Are there such things as voter regristration drives being conducted IN Christian churches and Jewish synagogues in the United States? Well, only if they want to conduct illegal activity and risk their tax exempt status.

"... activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not constitute prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner."

Again, see that image above. It's non-partisan, right? No illegalities here, right? Well yes, the illegalities are LEGION, and as long as these activities are illegal they must be highlighted and opposed with all of the vigor that can be mustered.

And again, where is the media on this? And where are those lefty "separation of church and state" squeaky wheels? As of this fine Sunday morning they are nowhere to be found. They're in "stealth mode" me thinks, or else they're actually afraid of Barack Obama.

Cowards.

The other Atlas Shrugs item is this which warms the cockles of my heart:

OBAMA'S COLB: HE HAS BEEN SERVED
Obama has been served:

SERVICE OF LAWSUIT CHALLENGING SENATOR OBAMA’S RIGHT TO BE A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE DOES NOT MEET THE QUALIFICATIONS HAS BEEN COMPLETED.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 09/04/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States, has received confirmation from his Process Service Company that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Senator Barack Obama were served today, September 4, 2008, with the legal documents pertaining to Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083. The DNC was served at 12:00 p.m. and Senator Obama was served at 1:00 p.m. The U.S. Attorney’s Office accepted service on behalf of the Federal Elections Committee (FEC) on or about August 22, 2008.

Former Pennsylania Deputy Attorney General Berg is a disgruntled supporter of Hillary Clinton's now defunct campaign, but I do wish his lawsuit every success. This is just another item that major media types have pretty much ignored.

For example, I sent an Email to Michael Smerconish of 1210 AM WPHT in Philadelphia about this the day the story broke hoping that it would make his news items the following morning. I listen every weekday during my morning drive to Ft. Dix, and to my knowledge not a peep has come from Michael on this, probably because he has thus far shown obvious favor to Barack Obama over John McCain.

The only item with respect to Obama's negatives that I know was not ignored was Dr. Laurie Roth's (The Roth Show) breaking of the news about Obama's close ties to William "Bill" Ayres. In that instance Sean Hannity has repeatedly claimed to break the story, but that claim is a complete falsehood. Laurie Roth broke the story and Hannity's producers know it for a fact. They admitted it to her during a phone call they initiated, demanded to know her source, and then balked at giving her credit because of an issue they had with the source. Jounalism at its finest. Not.

Hannity's producers should have handled it as I am handling this issue: Philip J. Berg is a disgruntled Clintonista, yet our objectives are the same with respect to Barack Obama. Therefore I wish him luck and give him credit for talking the talk, doing to research and backing it all up with legal action. Good on you Phil!

More data and an interview with Philip J. Berg, Esg. is available at AmericasRight blog.

05 SEPTEMBER 2008: Patrick Poole reports in todays entry of the Central Ohioans Against Terrorism blog that Barack Hussein Obama's presidential campaign has conducted illegal electioneering which occured at the national convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) held in Colombus, Ohio last week. Make sure you read the above link in full, then come back and finish reading the rest of this report.

Quoting Patrick's report:

"The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) is a 501c3 tax exempt organization. As is true for any 501c3 entity, especially a religious organization, ISNA is prohibited from hosting or supporting any partisan political activity. And yet at their national convention here in Columbus last week, ISNA hosted an Obama campaign booth in their exhibitors area as this picture taken on Friday night shows:"

In additional to violating the letter of the law regarding political activites of a 501C3 T.E.O. , and "the law" in this regard is most certainly something that Barack Hussein Obama is intimately familiar with, he should also be intimately familiar with the Islamic Society of North America's status as a federal unindicted co-conspiritor stemming from numerous exhibits entered as evidence last year during the Holy Land Foundation trial.

Moreover, those federal government evidences intimately linked the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) with the Muslim Brotherhood, also known in Islamic circles as the al-Muslimuun al-Ikhwan (or just Ikhwan or MB for short), and also established financial links between ISNA, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), the Holy Land Foundation and the Palestinian terrorist organization HAMAS.

Thus through Patrick Poole's report linked above we now know that Barack Hussein Obama, the 2008 Democratic candidate for President of the United States, has been caught red-handed campaigning at the national convention of an Islamic organization with known ties to HAMAS, a U.S. State Department acknowledged Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).

Another very important item that has been reported many times in the past year about the evidence of insurrectionist intent of the Muslim Bortherhood against the U.S. Constitution, as well as the People and Government of the United States of America, is the fact that in 1991 a memorandum was issued by the group delineating the "General Strategic Goal of the Brotherhood in North America." That general strategic goal was and remains delineated as follows:

[The Ikhwan] "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions."

Again, Barack Hussein Obama was caught just last week conducting illegal campaign activity at the national convention of ISNA, a group directly linked to the Muslim Brotherhood which is dedicated to the overthrow of our U.S. Constitution and form of government, and both of whom support the State Department listed Foreign Terrorist Organization HAMAS.

Barack Hussein Obama for President? Nothing could be more stark raving mad than this. Nothing. Yet the American liberal media will continue to support, and continue to intentionally disinform the American people about Barack Hussein Obama and his real friends and his real agenda. Is this not crystal clear?

UPDATE: Courtesy of former AFOSI Special Agent Dave Gaubatz and via his kidsandterrorism.com website blog, the Northeast Intelligence Network has been informed that ISNA offically endorsed Barack Hussein Obama for president on August 30th at the above referenced ISNA national convention. Dave has recorded video of the ISNA endorsement and poses the very proper question on the legalities involved in a 501C3 non-profit organization making such an endorsement. Personal endorsements are one thing, but organizational endorsements are another animal entirely.

The Left has gone to great lengths in reporting on the renoucing of endorsements received by Republican candidate John McCain from Evangelical Christian pastors John Hagee and Rod Parsley (see related article below and on the NEIN mainpage) based upon their personal convictions and preaching on the true nature of Islam.

It occurs to me that the nature of Islam as expressed by both pastors is entirely consistent with the above referenced "General Strategic Goal of the Brotherhood in North America." So where, pray tell, is the lefty media rancor for a repudiation by Barack Hussein Obama of the endorsement he has received from ISNA?

And in the conservative media, where are the calls for a renoucing by Barack Hussein Obama of this ISNA endorsement, a renoucing consistent with all of the links to the illegal funding of the HAMAS terrorists as detailed above? Where is the investigation into the legalities of the aforementioned? Did they not attend the ISNA convention?

And finally, for all of the Left's huffing and puffing about "the separation of church and state" one might think they'd be first on the bandwagon demanding such a renoucing of the ISNA endorsement by Barack Hussein Obama? However, don't hold your breath, I strongly doubt that Obama will be kicking any of his Islamist anti-American allies out of the communal bed anytime soon. That's a lovefest long in the making and long to endure.